Our Unsettled Constitution
WARNING
You are viewing an older version of the Yalebooks website. Please visit out new website with more updated information and a better user experience: https://www.yalebooks.com
A New Defense of Constitutionalism and Judicial Review
Louis Michael Seidman
View Inside
Format: ClothPrice: $65.00
Our shopping cart only supports Mozilla Firefox. Please ensure you're using that browser before attempting to purchase.
Ours is an age of growing doubt about constitutional theory and of outright hostility to any theory that defends judicial review. Why should a tiny number of unelected judges be able to validate or invalidate laws on such politically controversial issues as abortion, religion, gender, and sex—or even determine how the president is elected? In this provocative book, a leading constitutional theorist offers an entirely original defense of judicial review. Louis Michael Seidman argues that judicial review is defensible if we set aside common but erroneous assumptions—that constitutional law should be independent from our political commitments and that the role of constitutional law is to settle political disagreement.
Seidman develops a theory of “unsettlement.” A constitution that unsettles, that destabilizes outcomes produced by the political process, creates no permanent losers nursing deep-seated grievances, he says. An “unsettling” constitution helps to build a community founded on consent by enticing losers into a continuing conversation. The author applies this theory to an array of well-known cases heard by the Supreme Court over the past several decades, including the fall 2000 election decision.
Seidman develops a theory of “unsettlement.” A constitution that unsettles, that destabilizes outcomes produced by the political process, creates no permanent losers nursing deep-seated grievances, he says. An “unsettling” constitution helps to build a community founded on consent by enticing losers into a continuing conversation. The author applies this theory to an array of well-known cases heard by the Supreme Court over the past several decades, including the fall 2000 election decision.
Louis Michael Seidman is professor of law at Georgetown University Law Center. He is co-author of a widely respected constitutional law casebook and author of numerous articles on criminal justice and constitutional law.
“[A] fresh, innovative, thoughtful, and thought-provoking examination of the Constitution and its role in American law and politics.”—Library Journal
“One of the most thoughtful constitutional commentators has provided a fresh new look at how the Constitution as a text, and judicial review as a practice, function to mediate and provoke dispute in our republic. Anyone who is dissatisfied with the conventional wisdom that the Supreme Court’s function is to pronounce the final word in constitutional controversies should read this book.”—Laurence Tribe, Tyler Professor of Constitutional Law, Harvard Law School
“Our Unsettled Constitution is an important and original book. Professor Seidman is one of America’s most insightful commentators on the Constitution, and his book should be of interest to anybody who studies this country’s system of government.”—Christopher L. Eisgruber, Princeton University
ISBN: 9780300085310
Publication Date: December 11, 2001
Publication Date: December 11, 2001
272 pages, 6 1/8 x 9 1/4
